User talk:Ashley Payne

Hello, "Ashley Payne" and welcome to Wikipedia. A few tips for you:

Peruse Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers and associated pages, such as
You can experiment in the Wikipedia:Sandbox.
Sign talk page entries with ~~~~, which is automatically converted to a name and date.
If you have any questions, see Wikipedia:Help, or you can a question at the Wikipedia:Help desk.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian.

P.S.: When starting a new article, be sure to have a minimum of at least one full sentence describing the subject. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 17:18, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for leaving a note...

on my talk page. I cannot claim credit for all the dentaltwin bandwidth on the 'net-- at least half belongs to my brother Steve, who spends most of his time on CraigsList and the sci.med.dentistry Usenet group (to the exclusion of dentistry, I might add).

Although the talk page for dental amalgam is a bit tense, the main article is (to my mind) about as NPOV as you could reasonably expect. I doubt I could accomplish anything useful by stepping into the fray, other than to get involved in vitriol and invective. Not my cup of tea, as you Brits might say, but thanks for the invite. Perhaps I can get Steve to step in ;-)

By the way, I have my first case of true mercury sensitivity in my practice-- the first in over 28 years. It was confirmed by patch test by an "environmental dermatologist"-- never heard of that subspecialty, but he's apparently held in high regard by mainstream docs. It's the first case of mercury sensitivity he's seen too-- so there's nearly 60 man-years of experience and one case. Doesn't seem to merit the controversy it's garnered. Previous to the test, this patient was thought to have a severe case of erosive lichen planus-- confirmed by biopsy. Now let's see if it heals when I remove all the amalgams.--Mark Bornfeld DDS 20:44, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prognathism

Hello Ashley! It would be great if you could please check out the prognathism article and add some medical informations. Thanks! CoYep 16:31, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Many thanks in advance! CoYep 02:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prognathism

Hi, my name is Giorgio Fiorelli, I am an orthodontist from Italy. I have just seen that you were asked to check the "prognathism" article, the same happened to me. I just added something and I will try to do more in the future. Anyway please go ahead, we might do a good team work. Besides my English is far from being perfect.....

--Giorgio Fiorelli 11:53, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MJDF

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of MJDF, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.fgdp.org.uk/exams/mjdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 09:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion warning - MJDF

Speedy deletion tap will be placed on article MJDF if this article does not meet wikipedia standard. You are requested to work on it immediately. Please note that other editor/administrator can tag speedy deletion despite this warning. Thanks. TRIRASH 09:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not seeing speedy deletion tag on MJDF. Be careful, article names are case sensitive. Keep working on it. Even if it is deleted, you can first draft perfect article on your computer which meet wikipedia standards and recreate article. So back up. Wish you all the best. TRIRASH 10:32, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite mistaken. The first eight paragraphs were taken verbatim from the source. Not a single word was changed, although three of the copied paragraphs were repositioned. There may have been a small portion of the article that was written by you, buried down near the bottom, but it is unrealistic for you to expect others to go more than three or four paragraphs deep into an article before determining that it is a copyvio. You had almost a full day to eliminate your copyvio, but you elected not to do so, despite making several edits to the article after the CorenSearchBot warning. Please do not post copyvio text to Wikipedia, even if you plan to immediately edit it. For one thing, the copyvio text stays in the page history. For another, if you start with someone else's text, there's a good chance you will end up with a copyvio even after you paraphrase and change a few words here and there. Anyway, I just emailed the markup of the last version of the article to you. Please be very careful not to post any of the copied text, and good luck! -- But|seriously|folks 18:44, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And again, good luck with the article! -- But|seriously|folks 20:06, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MJDF RCS Eng

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of MJDF RCS Eng, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.fgdp.org.uk/exams/mjdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:39, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ORAL SURGERY

A tag has been placed on ORAL SURGERY requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.} 20:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And please don't use capitals in titles... _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.} 20:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dentistry#Specialities. Neıl ☎ 11:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dental specialties

This is a list of dental specialties just as the article name implies. However, it just so happens that this list is already covered under Dentistry as shown here [1]. Shoessss | Chat 20:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Dentistry#Specialities. -- Flyguy649 ^talk 20:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: dental specialties vary by jurisdiction and there are important legal consequences for those dentists who claim to be a specialist. the list on the dentistry article is complete for USA, but lacking for those in the EU where EU law defines the specialties. I imagine the situation for dental specialists is legally complex elsewhere in the world, and would merit a seperate page to outline the different specialties by jurisdiction. Ashley Payne (talk) 21:24, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Redirect per Flyguy. Kudos to Shoessss for spotting the origin of the article. This page was either created because someone thought that Dentistry was too big an article, or the information has been merged back into the parent article in anticipation of a deletion. It's not so large a table that it has to exist separately. Mandsford (talk) 04:22, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The section doesn't have to be spun out of the main article to include information on specialties in specific jurisdictions. And certainly we wouldn't want to add that information only to a sub-article, leaving the section in the main article Americentric. If the content grows disproportionately large it can be appropriately spun out in summary style. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Shoessss | Chat 20:54, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dental specialties

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dental specialties, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dental specialties. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 21:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Rotary technology

A tag has been placed on Rotary technology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ridernyc (talk) 02:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Endodontic files and reamers

A tag has been placed on Endodontic files and reamers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ridernyc (talk) 02:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Instead of creating lots of one or two sentence articles with no context, it would be better to work on articles one at time in your user space then move them when there is enough info in them. Ridernyc (talk) 02:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

Sorry it took me so long to respond. It has been a crazy month! Well, I am glad you joined us in WP:DENT, and any ideas are always welcomed. Also, for any questions you may have, you are more than welcome to ask me. I have been trying to manage the WikiProject and the Dentistry portal to spotlight some of the activity on dental articles and get interested editors to work together. So it is great to have you, and I will be seeing you around. - Dozenist talk 13:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Hi. I found your post on Dozenist's talk page while I was commenting there about something.

I see that you are fairly new here, and have contributed to articles such as rotary technology as well as reamers and files, both of which have been deleted based on lack of contect. I had been meaning to get some photos, but have been busy. I try to get photos in the articles because that makes it much more unlikely that these bots and scanning editors who don't know anything about dentistry will find them too pithy and delete them. I almost had lentulo spiral deleted because people thought I was advertising!

Well, I hope you have fun here! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 20:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

aloha from malaysia!:)

hi Ashley,how are u? i was browsing thru the website searching for the information regarding MJDF Dental Exams. oh ya..before go any further..let me introduce myself.

i am Ander from Malaysia, a dental officer, currently serving the public sector, i was trained locally -Malaya University. after 3 years of service i planned to further my studies abroad in Prosthodontics, which one of the requirement is to sit for and pass MJDF exam.

so far i have little knowledge on this exam, could u give me some guidance regarding it? where can i obtained information about the exam question examples, dates, where and how to register myself?

thank u in advance..good day! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.53.56.199 (talk) 01:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dental bodies corporate

The article Dental bodies corporate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 22:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix abscess

Hi. I could not fail to notice the number of dentistry articles that you are starting at present - good work. However, several of these articles have no references or sources in them at all. I would suggest inline references as the best option, but some sources or external links from reliable sources as a minimuum standard. Best of luck with your dental articles. Gilo ö 23:51, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chronic periodontitis

Great job! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 16:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help with dermatology-related content

I am looking for more help at the dermatology task force, particularly with our new Bolognia push 2009!? Perhaps you would you be able to help us? I could send you the login information for the Bolognia push if you are interested? ---kilbad (talk) 14:16, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nankali post

I thought so when I first saw the article, but it may be quite popular wherever it's actually done. You can't help some people being stupid. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 03:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nankali post

Dear Ashley,

This work is confirmed by three universities with its all documentation and observation within some years. I appreciate your imagination about removing tooth structure; yet there is a strong scientific calculation for this post that proves its efficiency.

I am not doing any business on this post and core but I know that in some places they are manufacturing the bur and even there are some dentists who are doing their masters on this post in different places.

However, I am very thank you for your comment.

Special Regards, --Ali nankali (talk) 11:42, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nankali Post-system

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nankali Post-system, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nankali Post-system. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 15:41, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dentistry -- Update

Hey there! Over the past year or so, the WikiProject Dentistry has fallen into disrepair. Dozenist hasn't been around in nearly 2 years, and after some email communication, he's indicated that he's no longer interested in heading the project. In fact, the project has been labeled inactive since November 2010!

My plan is to focus less on internal bureaucratic policy and more on article creation, article clean-up and article maintenance. That's why people use Wikipedia to search for dental topics -- because it contains wonderfully explained, wonderfully formatted information on relevant topics, not because there are 5 dental articles featured as GA or 7 articles featured as such. So if that's what you like, don't let me stop you, but I think the focus should be on, as I said, article creation and article maintenance.

I welcome all comments, questions and suggestions. If you're new and you'd like help, I'll try to guide you. You can check out my latest few articles: Underwood's septa, platform switching, Bone remodeling period, Cone beam computed tomography, C-terminal telopeptide and furcation defect. You cannot imagine how many dental students I come across at Columbia who tell me they utilize Wikipedia on a weekly basis, but find that there are not enough articles on dental subjects. So let's get out there are create well written, well sourced articles on dental topics. Have a great day! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 12:46, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Selection Criteria in Dental Radiography

The article Selection Criteria in Dental Radiography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet notability guideline for books: Wikipedia:Notability_(books)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rob 301 (talk) 11:56, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ashley Payne. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sorbus arvonensis

Hello Ashley Payne,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sorbus arvonensis for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 22:14, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to User talk:Cygnis insignis can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. — Wug·a·po·des 00:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any more personal attacks like this and you'll be blocked. If you have a concern about another editor's behavior, take it to WP:ANI with evidence; don't threaten to hound them in violation of the harassment policy. clpo13_(talk) 18:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made no such threat, what you just wrote is false and libellous. Apologise or I sue. Ashley Payne (talk) 10:23, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 12:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before being unblocked there is also the matter of personal attacks to address such at these:[2][3] [4]. You will need to retract your very unreasonable legal threat and agree to not be abusive to our editors in a convincing fashion before you are unblocked. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 10:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Previous warning. I was investigating this and was about to issue the same block when HighInBC beat me to it. Zero^talk 11:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see we are engaging in some kind of cosy victim-blaming pile on.

As the victim of a defamatory libel, I m within my rights to ask for a deletion and an apology. I have done so. If I do not receive such, I intend to seek legal redress and pursue damages to the maximum extant the law permits. You may think that unreasonable, I disagree. You are not the one who was defamed. Ashley Payne (talk) 12:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are using your talk page to continue making legal threats against our editors I have removed talk page access. You must resolve any legal action outside of the site. If you wish to contest your block you can use WP:UTRS. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 12:18, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]