User talk:Maeglin Lómion

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Hyacinth 00:50, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Good call on the V for Vendetta article!--P-Chan 04:52, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The V monologue

Greetings Maeglin Lomion!

I noticed that you also mentioned in your comments that Hugo omitted a bit of V's speach. What did you mean by that? It's almost as if you were saying that there was a different (original script) that was somehow changed in the movie. The reason, of course, that I'm asking this is because I'm doing some fact checking. A previous user has said that there were 55 words beginning with V in V's intro. That used to be the case, but after edits, this is no longer so. (It is now less than 55). A reply would be most appreciated, as it would help out the V article. Thank you Maeglin.--P-Chan 05:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm sure that the excised part was in the original script. Some critic [Sorry, forgot who] was going over the script, and criticising various parts of it, in which he included the "venerate what they once vilified" part. Then, I watched the movie [not quite legit copy, but we can ignore that], and Hugo doesn't say it.

It was probably originally written to include 55, but for some reason or other, Hugo didn't say that part. He just forgot, and they kept it? Not sure.

Maeglin Lómion 06:08, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not legit? I'm sure we all do it. :) I saw the V speech here. http://www.youtube.com/ (Search for "V for Vendetta"). How do you know all of this information about the original script? Do you have the source of where you heard this from (an article or webpage? Or.... perhaps you have the original script that had the original 55 words in it? I find this all very fascinating, and would love to salvage that part in the V for Vendetta (film) article concerning V trivia. If you have any leads or could point me down the right road, it would be appreciated. Again, thanks. --P-Chan 06:24, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of the Camp

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Battle of the Camp, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]