Talk:P-Celtic and Q-Celtic languages

P-Celtic and Q-Celtic languages is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles

Languages

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles

Lists

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles

[Untitled]

I strongly feel that this page and Q-Celtic should redirect to Celtic languages or else be expanded, rewritten, and ideally moved to "P-Celtic hypothesis". It's at Celtic languages that there have been discussions and edit wars concerning the P-Celtic hypothesis versus the Insular Celtic hypothesis – both of which have academic support. P-Celtic is not synonymous with Brythonic, because P-Celtic includes Gaulish; and Q-Celtic is not synonymous with Goidelic, because Q-Celtic includes Lepontic and Celtiberian... Oh, lord, I feel like I'm just repeating myself. The article Celtic languages just isn't big enough to merit being broken up into all these smaller articles yet. QuartierLatin1968 15:42, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody has objected, so I'll do it. Biscuittin 22:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P-Celtic/Q-Celtic hypothesis

I have split out Q-Celtic hypothesis/ P-Celtic hypothesis into brief articles that redirect back to Celtic languages. I have used only information from that page. Lucian Sunday (talk) 15:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think this was a good idea. "P-Celtic" also isn't necessarily a hypothesis, it may also refer simply to a typological grouping, not including any hypothetical claims. --dab (𒁳) 18:26, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this last point. It is a fact, not a hypothesis, that some of these languages use p/b where others use q/c, and if the terminology is intended only to describe this (which is how I would use it), and not to imply a stemma reconstruction, it is uncontroversial. (In this sense it is rather like Italo-Celtic, which can be highly controversial or entirely uncontroversial depending on whether it is linked to a stemma hypothesis or is merely understood typologically.) Incidentally, I would have spelled this with lower case letters: p-Celtic and q-Celtic. --Doric Loon (talk) 13:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]