User talk:Mkoval
Hi, Mkoval,
Generally, the articles about people should be named [[Firstname Lastname]] rather than [[Lastname, Firstname]].. I've changed Ludwig von Bertalanffy
and von Bertalanffy, Ludwig around. If you want to read more about the various ways we try to keep things simple and consistent, have a look at Wikipedia:Naming conventions. Happy wiki-ing... -- Someone else 21:38 Mar 29, 2003 (UTC)~
---
Thanks for the correction, I'm new to Wikipedia and haven't yet been able to master all the conventions.
BTW, where is the place to discuss posssible recommendations for section heading conventions?
- Not to worry, there are always more conventions being invented. They're impossible to master<G>. I don't know about a place for section heading conventions but the Village Pump is one place to try. -- Someone else 02:51 Mar 30, 2003 (UTC)
Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149
I've responded to your message on my talk page. --mav 00:00 Mar 31, 2003 (UTC)
I am looking for people interested in developing a GNU Free Documentation License Project Management Standard (just like the Project Management Institute Body of Knowledge, but possibly better).
Hi Mkoval,
I don't really know anything about project management, but I wish you luck with your project. If I were you, I'd try to locate the mailing list where project management people hang out, and post an announcement there. Cheers, AxelBoldt 17:41 Apr 6, 2003 (UTC)
- Thanks, Axel. That's exactly what I did just a minute ago! user:Mkoval
Mkoval, I see you want to set up a wiki. I strongly recommend that you do not try to use our Wikipedia software. If you're not an experienced programmer with MySQL experience, you'll have a miserable time with it. There are many, many other choices. I personally like UseModWiki, which is quite easy to set up and has a reasonable number of features. -- Stephen Gilbert 20:16 Apr 21, 2003 (UTC)
Mkoval, I reverted your change at Artemis because I don't think it is appropriate to make a disambiguation page for this subject. The goddess is much more famous and of more general interest, I think, and it looks like every link to the page is about the goddess, not the software. This is especially true since the software doesn't even have an article yet. I added disambig block at the top of Artemis. Tuf-Kat 03:58, Dec 14, 2003 (UTC)
- Good idea! Mkoval 14:12, 16 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Glad to see you started a new list. I made a couple of minor changes and I changed the TOC. What do you think about the alternative alphabet? I added your new list to the main business page. One question arises, How many links should we leave on the management list? In the past when I created a new list, like the IT list or HR list, I removed all links except the main category title article (in this case Project Management). What do you think? mydogategodshat 16:35, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- The alternative alphabet is much better!
- Thanks for adding the list to the list of lists. I was going to do it but I'm glad there are other people out there to help out.
- RE removing links on the management list, I think it's a good idea. Let's just leave the link to the main category title article and maybe to the list of project management topics. Mkoval 14:12, 16 Dec 2003 (UTC)
My message on mav's talk page
[edit]Sorry, my fault for not using a section header. I meant I had replied to mav, and not about automatic list creation. Apologies for the confusion :) Angela. 13:48, 30 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Process Management
[edit]I found this article and thought that you might know better what to do with it than I. Maybe merge it into Process management. mydogategodshat 08:23, 30 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Poland's betrayal by the Western Allies please vote to keep it. Cautious 20:52, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
The business and economics forum
[edit]Anouncing the introduction of The Business and Economics Forum. It is a "place" where those of us with an interest in the business and economics section of Wikipedia can "meet" and discuss issues. Please drop by: the more contributors, the greater its usefulness. If you know of other Wikipedians who might be interested, please send this to them.
mydogategodshat 18:51, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Unverified images
[edit]Hi! Thanks for uploading the following images:
I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 05:38, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.
Software
[edit]Just a note that I'm starting to make some changes to Project management software, List of project management software, and Comparison of project management software, which I know you're interested in. Ojw 21:26, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
List of process management topics
[edit]I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article List of process management topics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RichardVeryard 07:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
File:Dependency-FF.png missing description details
[edit]
File:Dependency-FS.png missing description details
[edit]
File:Dependency-SF.png missing description details
[edit]
File:Dependency-SS.png missing description details
[edit]
I have nominated A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Copyright problems with Extreme project management
[edit]Hello. Concerning your contribution, Extreme project management, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://architecturalpractices.com/articles_xpm.html,2=http://www.extremeprogramming.org/, 3=http://www.extremeprogramming.org/rules/overtime.html, 4=http://www.extremeprogramming.org/rules/standupmeeting.html, 5=http://www.extremeprogramming.org/rules/testfirst.html, 6=http://www.extremeprogramming.org/rules/pair.html, 7=http://www.ntcsindia.com/TechNotes.html, 8=http://books.google.com/books?id=u13hVoYVZa8C&printsec=frontcover&dq=extreme+programming&cd=3#v=onepage&q=&f=false. As a copyright violation, Extreme project management appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Extreme project management has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Extreme project management and send an email with the message to permissions-en
wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. - If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Extreme project management with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Extreme project management.
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Extreme project management and send an email with the message to permissions-en
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Abductive (reasoning) 06:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Process improvement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Process improvement for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Process improvement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Process improvement until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 9
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Theory of constraints, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constraint (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 15:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Please continue writing.Xx236 (talk) 08:34, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chupchik (theory of constraints), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constraint. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Extreme Project Management
[edit]Mkoval- I won't do it myself, but wonder if your article should be merged with Megaprojects.GESICC (talk) 16:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Mkoval. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Work (project management) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Work (project management) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Work (project management) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:59, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
The article Information mapping has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
registered trademark and copyright protected method of Robert E. Horn's company:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fgnievinski (talk) 21:16, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Information mapping for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information mapping until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.