Talk:Ziprasidone

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ziprasidone article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1

Pharmacology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine High‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Ziprasidone.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Archives

1

Where's the references?

This article is seriously lacking in some references. I wanted to know where they got the references for the "Pharmacokinetics" section, because it says it's 60% effective with food, then in the next paragraph, says 50-60% effective without food. I know for a fact (as I am prescribed and do take this medication) that it hardly works when taken without food, but I don't know the exact percentages, and I can't seem to find them anywhere to fix this section, but it would seriously help if there were some cited references somewhere. There is three for the whole article. This is highly unacceptable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anathematized one (talk • contribs) 19:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Synthesis

This article needs a section on how this chemical is synthesized. 2602:306:C518:62C0:5C06:758E:E477:60D6 (talk) 03:40, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzisothiazolinone

This drug appears to have this chemical as part of its molecular structure. No...no it really doesn't...at all.

Someone needs to add a section to this article on how this drug is synthesized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C518:6C40:F02A:330C:11CC:ACDB (talk) 23:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.chem24h.com/drug/synthesis/zagidjida.html

I found this information on how Geodon is synthesized. Someone should lift the information and add it to this article with attribution. 2602:306:C518:6C40:F02A:330C:11CC:ACDB (talk) 23:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eliminated comment since it was a copyright violoation. We cannot have copyrighted text in wikipedia.--Garrondo (talk) 20:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that Geodon has the biocide Benzisothiazolinone as part of its molecular structure. Once again, no...no it really doesn't...at all.2602:306:C518:6C40:505A:5C79:DCDB:627E (talk) 00:33, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Side Effects

Looking at Geodon's prescribing information, it does not cause side effects to the degree stated on this Wiki, as I can see. I can provide a link to the PDF. I personally take Geodon. It's been a lifesaver for me. I know personal experience may not be relevant to an Encyclopedia, but I have not had side effects to the degree listed on this page. I don't think that the listing of ALL of these side efffects is needed, as it may discourage people from taking their medication.. perhaps a separate page for the side effects, or listing only the "very common" would be better. I'll wait for someone to agree/disagree before I do anything else to the page. Sketches0993 (talk) 10:42, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from article

I have moved the following content here because it lacks context/explanation. If anyone wants to use it to improve the article, here it is. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[[File:Ziprasidone synthesis.png|thumb|center|700px|Ziprasidone synthesis: John A. Lowe, Arthur A. Nagel. [[Pfizer Inc.]] {{US patent|4831031}} (1989).]]

These articles need more History on this and other medicines and chemicals

Who is the name of the scientist who is the one behind Geodon and all involved? These articles need this information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.140.166.69 (talk) 19:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Detailed discussion of the mechanism

Belong in the body of the text not the lead IMO. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:21, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have added a brief summary. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:47, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oral administration of ziprasidone

DocJames and I have been repeatedly undoing each other's edits over a very small stupid thing. He inserted a couple very awkward references to the "by mouth form" of this drug, which I merely changed to the "oral form" of this drug. Who says things like the "by mouth form"??? That certainly isn't the language we use when writing an FDA-approved product label. Not only is "by mouth form" awkward and poor English, but DocJames writes on his profile page that "My spelling and grammar are poor, so thank you for correcting them.". Verytas (talk) 17:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:MEDMOS. We generally use easier to understand language. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest you use common language, and not language that sounds like a non-native English speaker Verytas (talk) 04:55, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:MEDMOS we use easier to understand English rather than technical English / Latin / Greek. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A quick search of the English Wikipedia turns up exactly 3 instances of "by mouth form", and 139 instances of "oral form". Yet you - who self admits poor spelling and grammar, and who invites well-meaning correction - have now appointed yourself judge over what constitutes "easier to understand English"??? Verytas (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We use the term "nothing by mouth" frequently and much more so than "nil par orus". Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:50, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

pronunciation

would someone please phonetically break this down for me so i'm able to pronounce it properly? 66.206.57.221 (talk) 05:34, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pharmacology

TAAR-receptor affinities missing. --0dorkmann (talk) 08:16, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]