Talk:Snodland

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Kent Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

History

The History section seems messy to me, but I have no idea what to do with it.... 24.215.177.116 02:20, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Pilgrim's Way (sic)

This is a name so does not have to stick to the correct use of grammar. See Westward Ho!. The OS uses all three forms on its maps Pilgrim's Way, Pilgrims' Way and Pilgrims Way. In Snodland it shows as Pilgrims' Way on the 1/50 000 and Pilgrim's Way on the 1/25 000. As the name was only invented in 1871 by E.R.James- it can be conjectured that, its name has John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progess as its source, so should be singular. Biblical language often uses the singular where today the plural is used. 'It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than a rich man to enter the kingdom of god'. And it has got to be said that this is the way a Pilgrim would approach Canterbury- rather than take the M25, A2, M2 and A2. It is not a case of possession.

Common usage, uses both forms, though Pilgrim's Way predominates. And even published titles are changed from singular to plural in citings. The grubby fact is Chaucer's pilgrims used the A2 and the ancient trackway probably was never used by pilgrims!

Yes, the wikipedia article Pilgrims' Way probably needs to be renamed and the hypercorrections removed. ClemRutter (talk) 20:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry; I think I misjudged the level of disagreement of sources, especially in the OS of all places. However, it does look to me that Pilgrims' is the more prevalent usage, cf. four of the six references on Pilgrims' Way, inluding Britannica, and more Google hits too. Both seem grammatically correct to me; one refers to the route of the abstract singular pilgrim and the other the route of multiple pilgrims. The Bunyan and Biblical considerations are moot since we don't conduct original research on Wikipedia. It seems sensible to keep what we see on the maps in specific places but Pilgrims' also seems a reasonable standard at least for the main article. I'll note the range of usages on that article. BigBlueFish (talk) 15:43, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Town?

Throughout the article Snodland is referred to as a "town". As a former local I've never known it to be called a town. When did this change? danno_uk 01:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that the council identifies itself as a town council is probably the best pointer. And just generally, a population of over 10k is definitely more than a village.Le Deluge (talk) 19:29, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]