User talk:Xoselg

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).

Heya, welcome to wikipedia! Please don't post copyrighted material (like that you find on other web pages) unless you have the explicit permission of the copyright owner (if you have this, mention it on the article's talk page). For more information, see Wikipedia:Copyright problems. --fvw 20:41, 2004 Oct 16 (UTC)

Image Tagging

Thanks for uploading Image:Castelao1.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Until a more informative tag is provided, it will be listed as {{no source}}. Could you add a better tag to let us know its copyright status? If you made the image yourself, an easy way to deal with this is add {{gfdl}} if you're willing to release it under the GFDL. Alternatively, you could release all rights to it by adding {{NoRightsReserved}}. This would allow anyone to do whatever they wish with your image, without exceptions. However, if it isn't your own image, you need to specify what free license it was distributed under. You can find a list of the tags here. If it was not distributed under a free license, but you claim fair use, add {{fairuse}}. If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images by posting to my talk page. If you do this, I can tag them for you. Thanks so much, Superm401-Talk 16:10, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Capelasanroque.jpg

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Capelasanroque.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 09:53, May 27, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Riabarqueiro.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Riabarqueiro.jpg. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you.

Image:Riaviveiro.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Riaviveiro.jpg. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you.

Image:Portodobarqueiro.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Portodobarqueiro.jpg. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you.

Image copyright problem with Image:Escudomanhon.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Escudomanhon.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logobng.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logobng.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:42, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Gomez das Mariñas

Thanks for your article on Gomez das Mariñas. However, it appears we already have a relatively well-developed article on this person at Gómez Pérez Dasmariñas. Please feel free to add any new and verifiable information about him there. GoldenRing (talk) 12:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of San Roque, O Vicedo

The article San Roque, O Vicedo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I did a huge search for this village in spanish but it seems that it does not exist nowadays, only a small chapel of the same name. In the book Galicia, II de Manuel Murguia it is mentioned with one sentence as a former village. Not sufficient for notability per WP:GEO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]