Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krawk Island

From VfD:

Not a neopet, but a place where htey live. There are some more like this too that need redirecting, assuming that there are only about a dozen of these lands. Dunc_Harris|☺ 16:52, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Delete the lot. No redirect. I believe the domains are listed in the Neopet article. If they're not, they should be. If they shouldn't be, they shouldn't be mentioned anywhere else, either. Geogre 17:48, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Agreed. This is ridiculous. One big Neopet article is fine. Lots of little Neopet-lettes is a waste of time and resources. Delete all and if someone wants to add the info to the main article, more power to him/her. - Lucky 6.9 18:05, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Merge and redirect. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 19:02, 2004 Sep 3 (UTC)
Like Meelar said. It's what I meant in the first place but it really didn't come out that way (blush). - Lucky 6.9 23:55, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Guan aco 02:34, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Ambi 04:10, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Wile E. Heresiarch 17:21, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Keep as merge and redirect. -- user:zanimum
Redirect. Joiz 20:04, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion