Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Poison gas in World War I/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For a long time this article was just a handful of tables, now.... The comprehensive efforts by User:Gsl are impressive and IMO deserve recognition. 62.252.64.12 00:57, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • Support. I've been reading a lot of the WWI articles lately, and they're all damn good. Someone seems to be editing them the way I edit Beatles song articles or Emsworth edits British government articles. Johnleemk | Talk 05:28, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. - David Gerard 18:55, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Ambi 12:33, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support - This article has been very useful in my research for chemical warfare. -- ClockworkSoul 19:20, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support but someone should go through the table of gases used, which was obviously taken from a contemporary source and uses teminology that is now antiquated. We have an article on Hydrogen Sulphide which is there under its old name of 'Sulphuretted Hydrogen', for example. Dbiv 19:47, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • It appears that they're legitimate red links, and some of those substances are rarely seen today. There's something really perverse in conventions that allow one substance to have ten different names, before we get to variations like sulphur/sulfur. iMeowbot~Mw 08:15, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oh yeah, and support. The article is consistent with (but much more complete than) books sitting around here that were written at the time. iMeowbot~Mw 08:15, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Gdr 13:04, 2004 Dec 29 (UTC)
  • Support. Very well-written. utcursch 06:36, Dec 30, 2004 (UTC)
  • "Support". yes well written and informative.