Talk:Murder Inc. Records

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip hop Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Mid‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 8 April 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Murder Inc Records to Murder Inc. Records. The result of the discussion was moved.

charlie baltimore

Murders of 50 cent and Jam Master Jay

How come the 50 cent and Jam Master Jay articles link to here, as Murder Inc. Records was suspected of involvement in their murders, yet there is no mention of them in this article? Doesn't seem right to me. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 02:28, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

50 Cent is dead?!? ;) Morhange 04:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

50 isn't dead! HeckXX 16:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Blood IN.jpg

Image:Blood IN.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Collectables By Ashanti album cover.jpg

Image:Collectables By Ashanti album cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RULE.jpg

Image:RULE.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rule 3.jpg

Image:Rule 3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External link

I'd like to add a video interview with Irv Gotti to external links. He is speaking about The Inc. Records. Here is the interview. Ammosh11 22:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who the hell wrote this?

It sounds like a 13 year old made this for a middle school book report. Using words like "Beef" and "Ja" are nothing like you would see in a encyclopedia and the sentance "Almosts left with no fanbase" is incredibly Biased this is such a horribly written article Im suprised its not up for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.22.13 (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the name of one rapper is Ja Rule, so the use of "Ja" makes sense, also cleanup is not a reason for deletion. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 20:24, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this article needs a serious cleaning. The grammar is poor, there are no real sources, there's heavy biased and "statements" that border opinions. It probably would be easier for someone to rewrite it from scratch than to try and fix this.--Jimmy Wang Yu: Version 2 (talk) 20:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking maybe a chinese guy wrote it or something. It is worth its comedy value though, I say keep it. 69.107.97.186 (talk) 23:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We seriously need to expunge the word "would" from the article. 69.105.109.37 (talk) 10:03, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 April 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 16:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Murder Inc Records → Murder Inc. Records – Every reference in the article uses the period after Inc. While a Google search does bring up examples of sources not using the period, it is not overwhelmingly common. Similarly, move Category:Murder Inc Records artists to Category:Murder Inc. Records artists. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 16:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 10:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.