Talk:Transatlanticism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Term

Is transatlanticism a real word???? 64.228.137.38 9 April 2006

No, but it's the real name of an album.--Hraefen ^Talk 18:43, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, transatlanticism is a word. 72.78.178.254 03:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can see it being used in 1933 and 1995 in books In ictu oculi (talk) 23:47, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This album is connected

All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen ^Talk 18:43, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring over multiple Pitchfork Media scores

The ratings template should not have more than 10 reviews represented; you're adding an 11th in what appears to be an attempt to paint a more positive picture of the album's reception (by Pitchfork, specifically). Your edits violate the score limit and the neutrality expected in having a ratings template (MOS:ALBUM#Album ratings template). There are other positive scores representing positive reviews of the album. There's no point having another one, especially if it means jamming it into a template that would over-represent either positive scores or a particular publication (WP:NPOV) Dan56 (talk) 20:36, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the needless aggression on my end - but could have mentioned beforehand instead of "no purpose" as would have stopped editing after reading. Again, apologies. (Wasn't originally a "better light" thing though - saw it on a few other pages and thought it looked better with a revision from a site). --109.156.89.116 (talk) 21:10, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Transatlanticism (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:49, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]