Talk:Figwit

Figwit has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 14, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
October 27, 2008	Articles for deletion	Kept

Current status: Good article

Middle-earth Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

First

Urm.... I have been assured that this character does, in fact, exist, by someone who should know; I wasn't really convinced by this page and the website. Could someone provide explanation of where the character came from? Was he a practical joke of the filmmakers, or what? And what is the _actual_ origin of the name figwit -- is that an acronym or a backronym on the page? The explanation you give contradicts the one on the flavor text of the card from decipher.com .

As far as I know, the character was at first just one of the many elves sitting in the Council of Elrond, doing nothing important. Then, as the DVD came out, some fans watched the movie over and over again, and for some reason Figwit attracted their attention, maybe because of his funny look [1]. A small fan-community quickly grew out of this phenomenon, they called him Figwit and started to collect every information they could find about this character and actor. It seems that because of this Peter Jacksons gave this character some lines to talk in the third movie of the series. I'm not an expert on this topic, so I may be incorrect in some of these points, feel free to correct me. --Conti|✉ 17:58, Aug 3, 2004 (UTC)

Elf Escort

Surely this is where this page belongs? Rich Farmbrough 15:21, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Given that the only notability the character has is as the "fangirl phenomenon" 'Figwit', this is the right place. 'Elf Escort' would refer to any of the escorts, including the non-Figwit unnamed Elves. If the fen would not be so obsessed about the character, no article would be needed. Jordi·✆ 15:26, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Figwit is official

I gave myself the Extended Edition of The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King for Christmas, and Peter Jackson himself mentions the Figwit phenomenon in his commentary. --Phil | Talk 09:49, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)

Cool, whereabouts? I assume during the "Arwen to the beach" scene…. I mentioned it in the article. Jordi·✆ 09:57, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

It's at the point where Figwit himself is on screen, which I think is the scene to which you refer…and, yes, PJ does use the name ;-) --Phil | Talk 10:52, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)

Melpomaen

Where does the name Melpomaen come from? Pure 'fan' invention? Jordi·✆ 23:57, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

It sounds a little too Greek-derivative to be any kind of genuine name; while we can't rule out being an offscreen production name, the crediting as 'Elf Escort' seems to make this unlikely too. -- Perey 09:12, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The name Melpomaen comes from the Figwit Lives! website - it's a "very loose Elvish translation of 'fig' and 'wit' " I believe it was originally coined to have a more 'elvish' name by which to call the character; this was before the name Aegnor came from the Decipher cards.

I went ahead and moved this unlikely and unsourced refource. A reputable source needs to be cited in order for it to be included.

I'm also removing these paragraphs, which as they currently stand are excessively fannish:

After the release of The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, some Lord of the Rings fans nicknamed another seemingly-innocuous character Fidwis, an acronym for "Faramir is dead... who is SHE?!?" Fidwis appears in Minas Tirith as Faramir leads a troop of Gondorian soldiers out of the city in an attempt to retake Osgiliath. However, Fidwis's fame never reached the heights of Figwit's, likely because excitement about the Lord of the Rings died down not long after the release of the third movie.

Figwit does little in the movies indeed, but by many Figwit fans he is viewed as a god, so basically he's famous for doing practically nothing.

That last paragraph is unnecessary (so no need to fix it) and I'm not sure that the second-to-last is worth mentioning. Basically the idea is a little-known piggyback on an internet phenomenon, not an actual internet phenomenon itself. -Aranel ("Sarah") 19:40, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

However, Fidwis's fame never reached the heights of Figwit's, likely because excitement about the Lord of the Rings died down not long after the release of the third movie. What the heck?! 222.126.73.236 16:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actual phrase

I read that sentence - "Frodo is great...who is that?" - again and again, and I just couldn't make any sense of it. It's just two disjointed sentences. Then I checked out the original fan site[2], where the orthography is: "Frodo is grea...who is THAT?!?" This made it clear immediately: a train of thought is interrupted as the spectator's attention is attracted elsewhere on the screen. It makes all the difference in the world!

Presumably some journalist who didn't get it has misrepresented the sentence in an article, and then the error has been perpetuated by lazy cut-and-paste journalism. Even the documentary film makers got it wrong! Anyway, I changed the writing in the article, and referenced it to the original source. Fan sites may not generally be considered reliable sources, but it's different when that was where the phrase actually originated. Lampman (talk) 11:22, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I figured it would be more clear without dropping the letters and using unnecessary capitals, but I see your point, so it's fine. Mr. Absurd (talk) 14:37, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same as Lindir

In the audio commentary and bonus material for "An Unexpected Journey" Peter Jackson makes it clear that Findir from The Hobbit (movie) is to be treated as the same character as Figwit from LOTR (movie). Figwit was an unofficial nickname and never appeared in the credits, so they decided to give him a proper canonical name for The Hobbit. This practice of retcon is well known of. I would fix the article myself, but it seems to be a status one. Anything in particular I should know? If not, I'll edit it anyway. 5.164.149.157 (talk) 23:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Figwit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081208132104/http://www.nypost.com/seven/06102007/entertainment/movies/kiwi_con_men_movies_sara_stewart.htm?page=2 to http://www.nypost.com/seven/06102007/entertainment/movies/kiwi_con_men_movies_sara_stewart.htm?page=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Figwit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080804180135/http://www.lotr-models.co.uk/index106.html to http://www.lotr-models.co.uk/index106.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]