Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anomalepididae
Anomalepididae was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete the article.
Another apparently lost/orphaned VfD nom, as the tag was added Nov 8, but there isn't a voting page, and it's not on "old". Apparently valid topic, but this article currently says so little, and Cleanup is so far behind, weak delete unless made into reasonable stub in time. (Procedural nom) Niteowlneils 23:44, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Valid topic, already a useful stub. Andrewa 01:03, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete if not expanded. Valid topic, not useful stub. The stub is poorly written and so incomplete as to be no more than the name of the article. Geogre 01:44, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: The article already reads in part FAMILY ANOMALEPIDAE (American blind snakes) Similar to Typhlopidae but some species possess a single tooth in the lower jaw. This family contains 4 genera and 20 species native to Central and South America. You don't think that's useful content? No change of vote. Andrewa 05:24, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- To me, that wasn't, no. The "similar to but different" seemed to me to be nothing more than what you'd learn by reading the Typhlopidae article. I.e. I thought this was created with information robbed from its brother. Geogre 15:00, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Valid topic, substub is not completely useless. — Gwalla | Talk 04:45, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Valid stub. (I've cleaned it up a bit; no new info) -- Eugene van der Pijll 09:12, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Strong keep based on the potential this article holds. [[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 02:12, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Why on earth would we delete a taxonomical family? Fishal 01:43, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep Agree with Fishal.sunbird 17:28, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.