Talk:Single-bullet theory

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Single-bullet theory article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 365 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative views High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Corrections

Second paragraph, "...a three-inch-long copper-jacketed lead-core 6.5-millimeter rifle bullet..."

The bullet itself is only a little over 1-inch. The OAL (overall cartridge length) is about 3 inches. Perhaps the confusion comes from the photo at right which appears to have a *centimeter* scale inset. Note that the bullet itself has a diameter of 6.8mm (.270 caliber) which matches up nicely if you imagine that the photo inset scale is in centimeters.

Recommend edit to "...three-centimeter-long..." to avoid confusion. --24.89.11.232 (talk) 03:40, 24 November 2009 (UTC) (a gun guy)[reply]

I might be missing something, but is this sentence incorrect? "posits that a single bullet, known as "Warren Commission Exhibit 399" (also known as "CE 399"), caused all the wounds to the governor and the non-fatal wounds to the president."Specificly, the line about non-fatal wounds to the President. It seems like a mistake, and at the very least is confusing. 74.128.56.194 (talk) 01:17, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JFK's throat wounds were considered to be non-fatal - he would have survived, as Connally did, if those were his only wounds. However, the wounds to the head were fatal. The SBT focuses on Connally and the non-fatal wounds to JFK, said to be caused by the same bullet. Canada Jack (talk) 19:00, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First paragraph in section about Right to Left Trajectory from 6th floor window. Was Wecht talking about and a "left to right trajectory..."? But the matter in controversy seems to be about a right to left trajectory. Is that a typo? Patriot1423 (talk) 03:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Culture section

i see that its been tagged for improvement for months. Most of the entries seem to be reaching extremely far in their connection to the Kennedy assassination and have no historical significance to the article at hand. The article would benefit as a whole if the entire section was taken out. J.Rly (talk) 04:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cerulean Depths (talk) 20:34, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Angle of bullet's impact

Section 4 reads: "The bullet is believed to have been fired from the sixth floor [~60 feet up] of the Texas Book Depository and traveled horizontally ~200 feet at ~16 degree angle [arctan(60/200)]. The street sloped at 3° 9' away from the Depository, making a total angle of about 19 degrees."

To slope away in my understanding means going downwards. Now, if the car ist driving slightly downwards at a ~3 degree angle, doesn't that *reduce* the relative angle between the line of fire and the car—in this case to 13 degrees, instead of cumulating to 19 degrees? If the street sloped away at a 16 degree angle, would the angle between the bullet and the the car really rise to 32 degrees – or would the persons riding in that car experience the bullet to come flat from behind?

Thank you for clarifying. Regards, Troubled @sset ^{Work • Talk • Mail} 00:36, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. If the ballistic trajectory intersects a level plane at an angle of about 16 degrees then it should intersect that tilted street at about 13 degrees. Maybe someone should fix that error? February 20, 2021 Patriot1423 (talk) 00:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The error noted by Troubled asset in 2013 has alrady been taken care of.Patriot1423 (talk) 05:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The latest ref about Cokie Roberts

Dear Mr. Phillips,

Thank you for your addition. However, I don't believe we at Wikipedia accept word of mouth as reliable evidence. If you interviewed Ms. Roberts as you assert, you'll have to produce a published copy of that interview. Otherwise I don't believe your testimony will stand on the page as it is right now. Thank you, warshy ^(¥¥) 19:40, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SS agent Paul Landis

November 2023, Secret Service agent Paul Landis came forward with claims that he actually found bullet CE399 wedged in the limo's seat behind Jackie, and that he pocketed it, then ultimately placed it on JFK's gurney. Someone might want to update this wiki with this info.

I suppose a question could then be asked: Where then did the bullet in Connelly's leg go? 2600:1700:A3D3:8210:EC76:3C30:FFFD:DF0A (talk) 06:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]