Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian witchcraft

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep moink 01:01, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Asian witchcraft

I'm finding this slightly confusing as some of the votes seem ambiguous. It appears to me to be:

Delete: 0? Ok...
Keep: Master Thief Garrett, Meelar, Eiko, Tim Rhymeless
Merge: Megan1967

That's a pretty clear consensus to keep, then.

Delete. This should be covered sufficiently by other articles. The example is random and unscientific. Eixo 21:35, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete. As above. Master Thief Garrett 21:48, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) Keep if Expanded. Master Thief Garrett 23:28, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
What other articles would this be covered by? If you guys give a good example of where this coverage is, merge and redirect, but until then, keep and tag for cleanup. Meelar (talk) 22:10, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, you're right, I've changed my vote. Master Thief Garrett 23:28, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Merge into Witchcraft. Stubby article could be merged there. Witchcraft already lists European and African but no Asian so it can be perfectly slotted in there provided the information can be verified. Megan1967 04:04, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
You're right. It has a right to live, I've put up a tag for attention instead. The article should deal seperately with each of the major cultural spheres of the continent. I've tried to give some structure to it, but I haven't written anything yet. Eixo 13:22, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Agree with Eixo. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 02:09, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.