User talk:MarkTBSc

MarkTBSc discovered Wikipedia in early 2005 and has contributed details to a couple of pages so far, notably regarding his home town, former employer and a favourite Author's fictional species. He's a caucasian male approximately seventy-two inches tall with brown hair.

Damn I think Wikipedia is wonderful... I just wish I had the brains and dedication to contribute more.

AfD nomination of Dead.winter

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Dead.winter. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead.winter. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kildar

The article Kildar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable per WP:BK

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paladin of Shadows

The article Paladin of Shadows has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a single hit on google news for this? Fails WP:NOTE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Last Angry Man (talk) 11:15, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paladin of Shadows for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paladin of Shadows is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paladin of Shadows until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Last Angry Man (talk) 15:58, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to US Airways Flight 1549. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Posleen

The article Posleen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, topic hasn't received coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Not a very active user (talk) 11:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]