Talk:List of anthropologists

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of anthropologists article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

List is on its way out

I recommend the replacement of this list with the current Wikipedia:Category named "Anthropologists" and suggest this list be considered obsolete. I have converted many of the listed names to the Wiki Category Category:Anthropologists, which is getting rather too big.

You can improve the Wikipedia by replacing every last one of these entries in this list with the link [[Category:Anthropologists | last name here, first name and initials here ]] at the bottom of the page. When you do so, please comment out the name on this list.

For those that I have marked with the category, I have effectively removed them from this list by commenting out their names. When all have been converted to the Category:Anthropologists category is time to eliminte this page.

Tom Lougheed 19:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC) Tom Lougheed 23:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason not to delete the page then?? Cander0000 (talk) 08:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deleting Chomsky

Regarding deletion of Chomsky: I meant generative, not "structural" linguist (it's been bugging me that I wrote that in the edit summary).

Still, Noam Chomsky is not an anthropologist — at least I got that right! User:Birdmessenger 13 December 2004

George Lakoff also is not an anthropologist!

Mark Ritchie is not an anthropologist

Mark Andrew Ritchie wrote a book on the Yanomamo that argues for a Christian worldview (or so I gather from a quick Googling). The fact that he wrote about the Yanomamo does not make him an anthropologist. Unless Spicynugget can produce any evidence that Ritchie is an anthropologist, his name should be removed from this list.--Birdmessenger 20:26, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, no verifiable reliable sources so far. If anyone knows of some please provide references! Please remember: verifiable and reliable sources. Weregerbil 08:0lfgdktireoryiptureoigjnfdksgn5, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Since the list is gradually being removed, you may find it more useful to ensure that the [[Category:Anthropologist]] stays off Ritchie's article, should it ever be written. Tom Lougheed 23:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete page?

If this article is really obselete, shouldn't it be deleted? 71.224.206.164 (talk) 09:56, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that categories do not supersede lists; per WP:CLN, the two can and do coexist quite regularly and comfortably. Also note that Category:Anthropologists is subdivided by nationality and "field of research", meaning that it isn't even functioning as a comprehensive list anyway — which is precisely why it doesn't serve as a replacement for this list. And incidentally, even if "obsoleting" a list just because a category happens to exist were the way things are generally done here, 71.* has it exactly right that the list would have to be deleted if that were the case; if a page is left to stand in articlespace, it is required to be an active article which has at least one active category on it. If you remain convinced that the list is unnecessary, you're within your right to take it to WP:AFD and try to have it deleted — but it does not, and will not, stay in place as uncategorized content that describes itself as obsolete. Bearcat (talk) 08:10, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notofication of obsolete status?

So, I just clicked edit and added a name to the list, before I noticed there's something weird about it. Is there any standard way to mark the page to prevent unsuspecting wiki-editors to add to the list? Now it says "This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it." ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjan82 (talk • contribs) 00:28, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]