This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Can we agree on the name of the location of the northern Knights Hill at grid referenceTQ320733?
If we say its in W Dulwich we miss out the other districts it straddles, e.g. Streatham Hill, & W Norwood. Although this article is 'W. Norwood' my preference is to say 'Tulse Hill' which covers them all.
The Peabody Hill housing sits in Lambeth. The current Bartholomew Streetmap puts it at Tulse Hill (but in SE21), and the current OS 'Magic' map shows the hill & tunnel to be crossed by the Dulwich & W Norwood ward boundary w. Streatham. The older OS map shows it to lie with Lower Norwood as a detached parish of Streatham. Ephebi18:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Could we refer to it being in several places? Is it notable enough for a seperate article as a hill or as a place. I know there was an issue about this before, but if we do this right, then I have no problem. Regan12322:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article isn't in particularly good condition. It needs the lists removing, the trivia integrating and a good amount of references added. Do people know good sources to look at. It is a shame that an important part of the area is in such poor condition. Regan12317:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well that's an improvement! There are still some lists in there that could be put into paragraphs and integrating the notable residents into the copy has worked wonders on other articles for stopping the continual adding of people. Regan12318:00, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've never heard of "Jack BC, Entrepreneur" mentioned in the notable residents section and there are no links or references, a quick google didn't show up anything either. one for the chop?
