User talk:UTSRelativity

Welcome!

Hello, UTSRelativity, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 00:26, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)

RE: Pearl Milk Tea article

Trivia: Yes, apparently I neglected to add the once per week part when I edited that section. It was an honest mistake, thank you for pointing that out. I've fixed it. However I stand by the rest of my edit. The original contained incorrect information (see the linked news articles) and was decidedly nonneutral in it's wording.

use the name -> are known as: As far as I know, most of the names in the list are general product descriptions and not brand names. i.e. "photocopier" as opposed to "Xerox".

removal of _much_ w/ reference to 1 cm diamete: Not sure if pearl sago is regarded in the same catagory as the more farmiliar large variety. Will look into this.

skills of making -> quality of resulting product Agree with your point. But "skills of making" sounds a little odd. Perhaps "skill in making"? Also, most people generally care about the quality of the final product be it by skill or ingredients.

Idlewild

I made some notes on the talk page regarding my edits. -Litefantastic 18:18, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

AOL

Sorry I didn't explain my revert - I've been having massive problems getting onto Wikipedia lately and never was able to put a note on the America Onlin talk page explaining my move, as I intended; the whole thing froze on me and I bailed. Anyway, I think your point was well taken but should be included in the America Online article, instead of turning AOL into a disambiguation page. Disambig pages should be avoided if possible - often it's not possible, of course - because they force a second click on readers. In this case, the overwhelming majority who go to AOL want to learn about America Online, not about "AOL" as an insult, so we shouldn't force them to go through a disambig. In my humble opinon, that is! - DavidWBrooks 01:00, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Kelisi

Moved from Talk:Scarborough, Ontario#UTS

"UTSRelativity is a male, Christian, Cantonese-speaking Chinese Canadian who was born in Hong Kong in 1985 and grew up in the Agincourt district of Scarborough, Ontario watching the Zone on YTV, his favourite TV station."

In that case, he jolly well shouldn't be telling a 41-year-old English teacher whose mother tongue is English how to write his own language, now should he? Do I tell you how to write Cantonese?

By the way, I notice that you spell "favourite" with a U in it. You're wrong about "neighbourhood"; it has a U. ———Kelisi 2005/2/10

You do not normally write Cantonese, you write Chinese. If you simply reverted the page and asked politely, I would have checked my references. I admit that I was wrong. I would like to note that what you did could be considered a personal attack and is bad netiquette, and I am not saying that my netiquette is good either. By the way, my user talk page may have been a more appropriate place for this discussion.

— editted by UTSRelativity 04:05, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

— UTSRelativity 03:56, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

That's "edited" — one T. (Kelisi)

For someone who claims to be a "41-year-old English teacher," it's pretty childish of you to lash out at someone -- and poke fun at their grammar/spelling -- on a public talk page, for all to see. Darkcore 17:55, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

@Kelisi—Thank you for reminding me, and if I was handing in an assignment I would check my spelling (although the markers do not care how words are spelled in code comments anyway). Note that this is a talk page; please stop posting spelling correction posts to such, because it is generally considered impolite. As it is, your response fails to address the problem, and instead focuses on spelling in metainformation. To avoid problems in the future, you would be well advised to post only when you have actual content. By the way, you can sign your messages with four tildes.

— UTSRelativity 18:08, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

UTS, you're taking this far too seriously. My only point was that we should all stick to things we know about. By the way, I was sure I'd read somewhere that there is no single spelling standard for English-language Wikipedia. That page further suggested, however, that spelling be consistent (ie not a mixture of Commonwealth and US spellings) throughout an article, but I notice that not even that rule is observed. I usually don't bother to "correct" that. Kelisi 19:54, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I agree with your point about sticking to things we know; however, it is not my opinion that I do not know Canadian English. I admit I was mistaken about the spelling of neighbourhood, but we all make mistakes once in a while. You are correct about the "spelling issue" on Wikipedia, although it is my personal belief that, for country-specific articles, we should strive to use the local variation.

My "taking this... seriously" (or as you say "[my] only point") is to explain to you that what you did is generally considered unacceptable online behaviour. This is not just my view—you may want to take note of Darkcore's reply above (which I moved from the original talk page). As an operator and moderator in various online communities, I strive to promote and practice good netiquette just as you seem to promote and practice the proper use of English. It may also be helpful for you to note that most "rules" on Wikipedia are simply conventions.

— UTSRelativity 20:42, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

It looks to me as though you want a really exciting cyber-fight. Sorry, you'll get none from me. Kelisi 00:39, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

LOTR One Ring BJAODN

Is there anything you can suggest to make "One Bad Joke to rule them all, one Votes for Deletion to find them, one Deleted Nonsense to bring them all and in the darkness bind them" shorter? -- AllyUnion (talk) 08:10, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Queen's University

Thanks for your comments. I have responded on my talk page. Ground Zero 19:44, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Ummm, please don't do that

Thanks for catching my mistake on my user page. I guess when I changed the example, I didn't make the change all of the way through.

But you should be aware that changing someone else's user page is considered to be a violation of Wikipedia etiquette. It really isn't done. In the future, you might want to just leave a note on someone's talk page to point out an error on their user page, rather than making the changes yourself.

I realise that you are a new editor, so I'm not offended, just surprised. Regards, Ground Zero 22:19, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Move of Naquadah to Naqahdah

While editing a Stargate-related stub, I noticed that you recently renamed Naquadah as Naqahdah. I think the original spelling is the preferable one, for a couple of reasons. First, a Google search indicates an 11:1 ratio in its favor. Second, whenever I have seen an episode of SG-1, the closed-captioning function has been enabled, and the spelling is always, I am quite sure, "Naquadah". If there's some information I'm missing, or a consensus on renaming the page that I missed, please let me know. NatusRoma 05:21, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CSD's

http://199.202.235.157/ylg/ontario.html shows just the municipalities in Ontario, and is up to date in terms of names. This shows them all http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census01/products/standard/popdwell/Table-CSD-P.cfm?PR=35 but is out of date in terms of names because it is from 2001. Scarborough is on neither list, as it was amalgamated into Toronto in 2000. -- Earl Andrew - talk 03:30, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

Relativity: Thank you for supporting my nomination for adminship. I am honoured that you and others think highly enough of my contributions here to support the nomination. The admin powers will enable me to patrol for vandals more effectively, amongst other things. I promise to use my new powers for good, and not to inflict the retribution on my enemies that they so richly deserve, as tempting as that may be. ;-) Thanks again, Kevin. Ground Zero 12:46, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bringing Wikipedia to Toronto

I've been working on a bid to bring Wikimania 2006 to Toronto. I have contacted KMDI, an institute at the University of Toronto. They are very interested in partnering with us, and can get us a full range of U of T facilities for free. With this offer I think there is a very good chance of bringing Wikimania 2006 to Toronto. The only thing we currently lack are people willing to help out. I'm willing to do much of the work, but for the time being I am in Ottawa and having some people on the ground in Toronto will be necessary. We also need a number of people willing to assist at the actual event, likely the first weekend of August 2006. If you are interested in helping out sign up at Wikimania 2006/Toronto. Preliminary bids from various cities need to be made by Sept. 30, 2005, at which point a committee will choose which city gets to host the event. The number of people willing to help will certainly be an important consideration. - SimonP 16:31, September 6, 2005 (UTC)

Kindred soul

I was just checking out who the other Anglican and Episcopalian Wikipedians are and if any were Canadian. Imagine my surprise at finding another Wikipedian who booed harris at "Mandela and the Children". Me too! Carolynparrishfan 21:41, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Postal Code

Canada does not come after the postal code.

Anglican userbox

Hi, it may interest you to know there is now an Anglican userbox. It's {{user religion|anglican}}. --Angr (t·c) 09:49, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Canada

Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 02:07, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct of course. However, tagging them as {{no licence}} gives the uploaders a week to come up with another licence tag, rather than making them speedies immediately, and also lets me take advantage of User:OrphanBot's notification rather than having to do it myself. JYolkowski // talk 21:38, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion

Hello! I noticed that you have identified yourself as an Anglican, and so I thought that you may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion! Cheers! Fishhead64 23:55, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:YellowstoneClass.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:YellowstoneClass.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:27, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of PassMe

PassMe, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that PassMe satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PassMe and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of PassMe during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Spigot Map 01:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:St Mark's CopticChurch--TO.jpg

Hello, there.

I just wanted to know if you're able to take a picture of St. Mark's Coptic Orthodox Church in Toronto. You can find out the street address online (the links to those websites are on the image pages). The current images are, unfortunately, copyrighted, as I was the one who uploaded them.

The current (copyrighted) images may get deleted, so if they do, then I'll need to replace them.

I need you or somebody else to take a picture, release its copyright, and upload it onto Wikipedia. I HAVE contacted others to notify them also, so if there are more than one pictures, that's OK (I can still make an article on them). I want these images to be used for, specifically, the article "Coptic Orthodox Church in Canada". The image page is, again:

Toronto: Image:St Mark's CopticChurch--TO.jpg

~ Troy 22:34, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Western Air Temple

The page is still protected from editing and is locked into a version with obvious mistakes. —UTSRelativity (talk) 22:46, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It took me for a moment to notice, but I fixed that while you were typing :P Thanks for the message, though, it would've otherwise taken a while to fix if I hadn't noticed. Have at it. --Kizor (talk) 22:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello, UTSRelativity. You have new messages at roux's talk page.

You can remove this notice at any time by removing this template.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, UTSRelativity. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]