Talk:Elaine, Arkansas

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arkansas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled

Wondering how to edit this U.S. City Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Cities standards might help.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Elaine, Arkansas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No reference supporting claims made in this article: "an estimated 237 black people were killed in the rural county by rampaging white mobs"

I was under the impression that Wikipedia had standards for weeding out opinion-based interpretations of historical events; standards that inhibited the creation of false narratives, and re-writing history to serve a specific ideology or point of view.

I am sorely disappointed to find this article parrots without citation or reference of any kind, the claim that: "an estimated 237 black people were killed in the rural county by rampaging white mobs"

Exactly whose estimate is this? How did they arrive at the estimate... a grave count, human remains, written records, census reports before and after, body counts??? Making a claim as horrific as this demands substantiation and references; irresponsible claims serve no one's best interests - save that for Twitter.

Similarly, the article on The Elaine Massacre also carries this "estimate" without citation or reference.

Falsehoods and exaggerations in a Wikipedia article documenting a historical event do not benefit anybody's cause. The truth is bad enough - exaggerations and made-up statistics only subtract from credibility, and give deniers a foothold. This is especially true in the current environment in the USA in 2020. IF YOU CANNOT SUBSTANTIATE IT, DO NOT PUBLISH IT ON WIKIPEDIA!

Seamusdemora (talk) 08:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this policy as well. The content which was removed here and at Elaine massacre is supported my numerous sources, some of which I've brought from the other article here. We have a duty to try to create the articles accurately, and removing easily sourced information such as this is not productive. Shouting by using all caps, is also not considered civil behavior. In the future, please take time to review sources already in articles before removing long-standing content and accusing other editors of "Falsehoods and exaggerations", especially when your accusations are easily proven false. Jacona (talk) 12:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]