Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Gower
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 19:56, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
Delete notable?, seems like vanity to me. --Boothy443 06:43, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- count me in. If you like yourself that much, why not put up a User page, right? mu5ti/✏ 19:33, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I know Bryan, and while he is a bit vain, I've found him to be an important contributor to the philosophical dialogue and the development of a vital community project called Crosstown Coffeehouse, which is a test run of what will be a national phenomenon. ~ Dave Nederhood
- Dave, while your defense is appreciated, I don't think a test-run community project is sufficiently notable for inclusion. Perhaps when (and if) this indeed becomes a "national phenomenon," the biography of Bryan Gower will go up on Wikipedia - until then, I recommend a delete. RidG (talk) 09:58, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
- 'Delete - insufficiently notable. Will reconsider if evidence of notice in national press.
- When his project is national phenomenon, we will have an article on him. Meanwhile, lets do a test run of our delete code. --BM 00:14, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not encyclopedic. Wyss 02:56, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Are you a... gower? Say no more. Say no more. Nudge, nudge, wink wink. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:29, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, Crosstown Coffeehouse doesn't rate an article, so why should this guy? RickK 00:44, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete without more verifiability - David Gerard 18:12, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.